Powerbank Für Ipad Pro 12.9 Test
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) Review: Fine-tuning the Flagship
More than but a tablet. Even though the iPad Pro 12.nine (2020) is cheaper than its predecessor, it comes with superior hardware. For instance, Apple has equipped its tablet for professional users with a stronger SoC besides as a new 12-MP camera with a LiDAR sensor. The device is nonetheless holding on to the claim of being able to fully replace a traditional laptop.
As with the previous version, Apple tree has positioned the iPad Pro (2020) equally a laptop replacement. Without the optional keyboard notwithstanding, it still remains a tabet for the most part - although the device is adequately big in our case.
Having already tested the eleven-inch model Apple iPad Pro 11 (2020), we are now taking a look at the bigger model, the Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2020). It comes fairly shut to a meaty notebook with its XXL form factor. According to Apple, it is even supposed to be faster than the majority of them. Our review volition evidence whether this is actually the instance.
While the exterior of the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) barely differs from its predecessor Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2018), at that place are a few new components on the within. This includes an fifty-fifty more powerful SoC (Apple A12Z Bionic), 6 GB of RAM across all memory configurations and an updated 12-MP camera module. The specifications also list Wi-Fi half dozen and a LiDAR scanner for augmented reality that is integrated into the photographic camera.
Display
12.90 inch 4:3, 2732 x 2048 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, Liquid Retina Display, IPS, wide colour display (P3), fingerprint-resistant oleophobic blanket, fully laminated, anti-reflective coating, i.8% reflectivity, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB NVMe, 256 GB
, 248 GB free
Weight
641 k ( = 22.61 oz / 1.41 pounds), Power Supply: thirty 1000 ( = 1.06 oz / 0.07 pounds)
Annotation: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or retentiveness sticks with similar specifications.
Example - Lightweight and Slim, but Slightly too Flexible
Despite its huge size, the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) is a very slim device. It owes this to its beautifully slim bezels and a build summit of just 5.9 millimeters (~0.23 in), which has besides been a highlight of the identically-sized Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2018).
As with other Apple products, there are no flaws in terms of the build quality. The argent or space gray aluminum unibody of the iPad Pro 12.nine (2020) not only looks very sleek, but also has a premium experience. Even though the camera module still protrudes from the back of the device past a few millimeters, the iPad Pro does non wiggle around on flat surfaces. Although the corner on the opposite side of the photographic camera module yields slightly in this case, this is not an outcome during utilize.
A disadvantage of the slim construction: With a sufficiently large amount of force, information technology is possible to produce wavelike distortions on the brandish or twist the example slightly. That being said, the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) is definitely sufficiently robust for daily utilize. All the same, there is still no IP certification.
Size Comparing
❌
Features - At present with 6 GB of RAM past Default
The iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) starts at 1099 Euros ($999). For the price, buyers get 128 GB of storage and Wi-Fi connectivity. Our test device is the second cheapest version at 1209 Euros ($1099) and comes with 256 GB of storage space. The top configuration includes i TB of storage space and an additional LTE module for 1819 Euros ($1649). The iPad Pro 11 (2020) starts at 879 Euros ($799).
With the iPad Pro 12.nine (2018), Apple has already abandoned the Lightning port. Similarly, the current iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) relies on a USB-C port, which supports USB 3.one Gen i speeds. It can be used to transfer photos to a PC and combined with an appropriate HDMI adapter, to connect external displays. The physical connectivity besides includes a dock port with 3 pins on the dorsum and a magnetic connector for the Apple tree Pencil on the correct edge.
Aside from the traditional Smart Keyboard, the new Magic Keyboard can too be connected to the dock port. The new keyboard has a floating blueprint, backlit keys and an integrated trackpad. With it, the iPad comes adequately close to a notebook in terms of functionality.
Software - iPadOS 13.4 Leads the Style
The Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) runs iPadOS 13. Starting with the latest version available at the time of testing (13.iv), the operating system supports touchpads and mice. If one of these peripherals is used, the tablet shows a cursor that changes depending on the context.
Since iPadOS is of form designed for the Apple universe, the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) is only usable as a notebook replacement in a limited chapters. Unlike on a PC, the file management is rudimentary and transferring information requires iTunes or deject solutions. Similarly, Windows users have more options when it comes to the app selection, since in that location are unremarkably dozens of software applications for any given apply instance. That being said, Apple continues to make more footing in this section. The iPad version of Photoshop for example, is coming closer and closer to the PC/Mac versions.
Communication and GPS - WiFi-6 Speeds Only for Transmissions
The iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) supports the latest Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi half-dozen. In conjunction with our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12, it does not quite achieve the expected results when receiving information. Hither, high-end competitors such as the Microsoft Surface Pro vii and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 are able to accomplish meliorate transfer rates.
The Apple tablet is as fast equally the iPad Pro 11 (2020), which is equipped with the Wi-Fi module, and slightly faster than the iPad Pro 12.nine (2018).
Our configuration of the iPad Pro 12.ix (2020) lacks a GPS module. While navigation is possible via Wi-Fi networks and compass, the tablet is not the best choice for navigation purposes due to its XXL course gene.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf iii.ane.3: Ø611 (573-630)
; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø814 (400-880)
Cameras - New 12-MP Lens with LiDAR Sensor
The Apple tree iPad Pro 12.ix (2020) integrates the same camera as the 11-inch model. It is based on a 12-megapixel main sensor with optical epitome stabilization that is supported by an ultra wide-angle lens with a resolution of ten megapixels.
Apple has integrated a LiDAR (calorie-free detection and ranging) scanner within the 12-MP photographic camera. Information technology measures the travel time of calorie-free from a distance of up to 5 meters (~16 ft) with a margin of error within nanoseconds co-ordinate to Apple. This makes the tablet an excellent device for augmented reality applications.
For a tablet, the image quality of the iPad Pro is to a higher place average. In daylight (scene 1), the results look very lifelike without sacrificing color accuracy. Even in ultra broad-angle shots (scene 3) or at 5x zoom (scene 4), the iPad Pro manages to fairly accurately capture many fine details. However, the tablet does non fare well in low-low-cal situations (scene ii). Here, the difference compared to current smartphone optics is the most noticeable.
We accept no complaints when it comes to video recordings. The iPad Pro records at 4K with upwardly to 60 frames per second and the video quality is outstanding. The aforementioned holds true for the selfie camera, which aside from a resolution of 7 MP besides offers features such equally a portrait way that blurs the groundwork.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate inside the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. Ane click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The beginning paradigm shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
click to load images
click to load images
click to load images
click to load images
In our laboratory, the main photographic camera manages to produce pictures with a high dynamic range and for the most part accurate colors, provided the lighting conditions are expert. In this case, the iPad Pro also captures our test chart with a great deal of sharpness. However, poor lighting conditions quickly overwhelm the tablet's optics. The color deviations are and then substantial and details become duplicate from one another.
0 ∆Due east
ii.6 ∆E
2.vi ∆Due east
five.six ∆E
3.8 ∆E
two ∆Due east
iv.3 ∆E
three.nine ∆E
3.4 ∆E
vi ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆Eastward
3.9 ∆E
3 ∆Due east
2.eight ∆East
4.6 ∆E
half-dozen.5 ∆E
vi.four ∆East
5 ∆Eastward
four.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆Eastward
eight.9 ∆E
30.two ∆East
52.viii ∆Due east
38.9 ∆E
33.2 ∆Due east
44.9 ∆Due east
58.2 ∆East
50.8 ∆E
32.eight ∆Due east
42.1 ∆Eastward
31.2 ∆East
60.9 ∆East
61 ∆E
27.nine ∆E
44.ix ∆E
36.1 ∆East
71.vi ∆E
43.iv ∆E
40.half-dozen ∆Due east
74.8 ∆Due east
68 ∆E
l.seven ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆Due east
13.v ∆E
Accessories and Warranty - Many Choices for the iPad Pro
Apple includes a USB-C ability adapter rated for upwards to 18 watts with the iPad Pro 12.nine (2020). The package also includes a USB-C cable (type-C to type-C) and a folded slice of newspaper with a quick beginning guide and the warranty data.
Apple only offers buyers of the tablet a 1-twelvemonth warranty. Thankfully, this does not affect the seller guarantee. In the EU, it is valid for 24 months offset from the date of purchase.
AppleCare+ can be selected as an optional service for 139 Euros ($129). Users are then protected against accidental damages for 2 years. However, only two repairs are covered and Apple charges an boosted service fee. Buyers who wish to lower the cost of the iPad Pro can endeavour to get credit for their sometime tablet via Apple's trade-in selection on the Apple web store.
Aside from the usual accessories, which include the Apple Pencil (135 Euros/$129) and the Smart Keyboard (219 Euros/~$159), the Magic Keyboard will thus be available for both tablets at the terminate of May. For a hefty 399 Euros (~$349), buyers receive a full-featured notebook keyboard with backlit keys and an integrated touchpad. As with the Smart Keyboard, the Magic Keyboard magnetically attaches to the iPad Pro, but unlike the former, the Magic Keyboard suspends the tablet in the air to a higher place the keyboard, which allows users to freely conform the bending.
Input Devices & Treatment - Very Responsive Touchscreen
The Apple tree iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) responds extremely quickly and precisely to inputs, which information technology owes non merely to the fast octa-core processor A12Z Bionic but also the 120-Hz brandish that guarantees a very smooth visual experience. Daily tasks such as switching between applications, starting apps or scrolling through web pages or menus are non even close to being a challenge for the tablet.
Similarly, the virtual keyboard's generously-dimensioned keys and the three physical buttons on the tablet integrate seamlessly into the user experience. The ability/standby push on the summit edge and the volume buttons on the right border require a small, adequate amount of actuation strength. They fit neatly into the chassis and offering a satisfying acoustic feedback.
There is no fingerprint sensor on the iPad Pro. Instead, users can cosign themselves via a pin code or FaceID. The facial recognition worked well in our test and quickly unlocked the tablet.
Display - iPad Pro with 120-Hz Truthful Tone Console
The master focus of the iPad Pro has not changed with the 2020 update: The latest iPad Pro also comes with a liquid retina display with a 120-Hz refresh rate.
With an boilerplate brightness of 598.seven cd/m², the display shines brighter compared to the displays of Microsoft'due south and Samsung's alternatives. With the ambient light sensor disabled, the luminosity increases to up to 631 cd/m², whereas nosotros measured a effulgence of 624 cd/thou² in our test with evenly distributed brilliant and dark areas (APL50).
While the 12.9-inch iPad displays 2732x2048 pixels, the 11-inch model has a native resolution of 2388x1668 pixels. Thus, there are no differences compared to the previous models, which includes the remaining specifications. Similarly, the big and the minor iPad Pro both once again sport a high pixel density of 265 PPI. Furthermore, True Tone allows the tablets to accommodate the brandish'southward colors to ambience lighting weather for uniform-looking colors in about whatever situation.
| 638 cd/m² | 623 cd/m² | 605 cd/m² | ||
| 615 cd/k² | 625 cd/m² | 594 cd/m² | ||
| 558 cd/m² | 578 cd/m² | 552 cd/yard² | ||
Distribution of effulgence
Liquid Retina Display
X-Rite i1Pro ii
Maximum: 638 cd/g² (Nits) Average: 598.vii cd/m² Minimum: 2.53 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 625 cd/1000²
Contrast: 1330:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/thousand²)
ΔE Color 1.iii | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale one.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Apple iPad Pro 12.ix 2020 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.xc | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00 | Microsoft Surface Pro vii IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, ten.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 15% | sixteen% | 5% | -47% | |
| Brightness eye | 625 | 632 i% | 617 -1% | 435 -30% | 446 -29% |
| Effulgence | 599 | 605 1% | 585 -2% | 422 -30% | 445 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 84 -3% | 90 3% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.32 32% | 0.36 23% | 0.32 32% | |
| Contrast | 1330 | 1975 48% | 1714 29% | 1359 2% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.1 15% | 0.94 28% | ane.xviii nine% | 2.vii -108% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | two.seven | 2.4 xi% | 1.87 31% | 2.27 sixteen% | 5.4 -100% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | i.8 | 1.seven 6% | 1.four 22% | 1.12 38% | 2.1 -17% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | two.156 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6765 96% | 6794 96% | 6733 97% | 6502 100% | 6468 100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.49 | ||||
| Colour Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | ||||
| Color Space (Pct of sRGB) | 96 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will but cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human being eye. If said frequency is likewise depression, users with sensitive eyes may feel strain or headaches or fifty-fifty detect the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 58820 Hz | ≤ 13 % brightness setting |  |
| The display backlight flickers at 58820 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 13 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 58820 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19737 (minimum: v - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
The image quality of the iPad Pro 12.9 (2018) was already fantabulous. The iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) continues this tendency. A closer look with a spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software shows that the brandish comes very close to the platonic gamma value and colour temperature. With DeltaE values of < ii, the colour representation is within the optimal range besides. Thus, the iPad Pro 12.ix (2020) is very well suited to work where verbal colors are paramount.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times evidence how fast the screen is able to change from one colour to the adjacent. Ho-hum response times tin pb to afterimages and can cause moving objects to announced blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Blackness to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.iv ms ... rising ↗ and autumn ↘ combined | ↗ 8.four ms rise |  |
| ↘ xvi ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, simply may exist too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time l% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.8 ms ... ascent ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms ascension |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response fourth dimension is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.3 ms). | ||
Thanks to its brilliant display, the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) is a solid device for outdoor use. Meanwhile, the good viewing angles of the IPS display ensure that the screen'southward content remains easily distinguishable fifty-fifty when viewed from steeper angles.
Performance - It'due south Alone at the Top
The new iPad Pro is equipped with the Apple A12Z Bionic. The octa-core SoC based on the 7nm procedure supersedes the A12X of the previous iPad and it has an improved thermal design, which co-ordinate to Apple, allows for a improve peak and long-term functioning.
As the synthetic benchmarks evidence, the iPad Pro 12.ix (2020) is slightly faster than the iPad Pro 12.ix (2018) and it outperforms even the fastest Android tablets. Since it is equipped with 6 GB of RAM by default - only the 1-TB configuration of the predecessor had this much system retention -, information technology tin can handle big files and demanding applications fifty-fifty amend than its predecessor.
Unfortunately, many benchmarks were non nevertheless compatible with iPadOS thirteen.4 at the time of testing, including 3DMark Sling Shot, GFXBench and Basemark Os II. Nosotros will perform these benchmarks at a afterwards date, when the advisable updates take been released.
| Geekbench 5.iv | |
| Single-Core | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (1117 - 1127, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.nine 2020 | |
| Average of class Tablet (133 - 1719, n=twoscore, last 2 years) | |
| Multi-Cadre | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.nine 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (4707 - 4712, n=ii) | |
| Apple iPad Pro eleven 2020 | |
| Average of class Tablet (455 - 7378, north=40, concluding 2 years) | |
| Metal Score v.1 | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Average Apple tree A12Z Bionic (9984 - 10011, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro xi 2020 | |
| Boilerplate Apple A12Z Bionic (110582 - 110846, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Average of course Tablet (9424 - 105536, n=5, concluding 2 years) | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Water ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (220422 - 221941, n=2) | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 12.nine 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.nine 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Boilerplate of grade Tablet (8643 - 208752, n=five, last 2 years) | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Tempest Unlimited Physics | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 | |
| Boilerplate Apple A12Z Bionic (40279 - 40299, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.nine 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
| Boilerplate of class Tablet (11228 - 38650, due north=5, terminal two years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.i / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.nine 2020 | |
| Boilerplate Apple A12Z Bionic (5657 - 5709, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro xi 2020 | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 12.9 2018 | |
| Average of class Tablet (half dozen.2 - 6745, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Fable
Microsoft Surface Pro seven Intel Cadre i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 Eu), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Browsing the web with the Apple tablet is a breeze. Pages are displayed in a snap and content such as videos load very quickly.
| Jetstream 2 - Full Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro xi 2020 (Safari 14.one) | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome eighty) | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari thirteen) | |
| Boilerplate Apple A12Z Bionic (124.v - 127.four, n=iii) | |
| Boilerplate of class Tablet (15 - 184.3, north=33, terminal 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| JetStream ane.1 - Full Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.nine 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Apple iPad Pro eleven 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Boilerplate Apple A12Z Bionic (272 - 274, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari xiii) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro seven (Microsoft Border 44.18362.449.0) | |
| Average of class Tablet (22.ane - 436, n=35, concluding two years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome lxxx) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Average Apple tree A12Z Bionic (140 - 194, n=3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Boilerplate of class Tablet (24 - 254, due north=37, concluding two years) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPad Pro eleven 2020 (Safari 14.one) | |
| Boilerplate Apple A12Z Bionic (135 - 154, n=2) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.ix 2020 (Safari xiii) | |
| Average of course Tablet (12.vi - 255, n=31, final 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
| Apple tree iPad Pro 12.9 2020 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Apple A12Z Bionic (42372 - 43057, north=3) | |
| Apple iPad Pro eleven 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro seven (Microsoft Border 44.18362.449.0) | |
| Boilerplate of class Tablet (3111 - 66974, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.one - Full Score | |
| Boilerplate of form Tablet (455 - 12972, northward=37, last ii years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro seven (Microsoft Edge 44.18362.449.0) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome eighty) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.ix 2020 (Safari xiii) | |
| Average Apple tree A12Z Bionic (646 - 646, n=ii) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2018 (Safari Mobile 12) | |
* ... smaller is better
As per usual, Apple tree provides no information concerning the type or operation of the internal storage. Due to this, nosotros used the app PassMark to get a crude judge of the speed.
The PassMark results confirm our expectations and adjure the internal storage very high transfer speeds. The real-world experience mirrors the high benchmark scores. The system responds very chop-chop and navigating through menus and applications is extraordinarily smooth.
Gaming - No Limits
The tablet runs games very smoothly. In our test, information technology did not intermission a sweat when faced with our selection of games that consists of current and graphically demanding titles. Examples "PUBG Mobile" and "Cobblestone 9: Legends": Our exam tool Gamebench confirms the maximum possible frame rates for both games, which in the case of "PUBG Mobile" is slightly above 30 FPS and the sixty FPS limit for "Asphalt nine". Every bit these results testify, the 120-Hz display is not been taken advantage of hither. Meanwhile, the iPad Pro is also well suited to gaming thanks to the keen audio produced past its 4 speakers.
; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø31.7 (28-34)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.2.2: Ø59.3 (50-60)
Emissions - Powerful Quad Speakers
Temperature
While idling, only a few spots on the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) become slightly warm to the bear on. Under load, the temperatures barely ascension and the heat is distributed evenly across the entire surface of the tablet. Conveniently, the hot spots are located in the center, which users are most unlikely to come into contact with when holding the device.
We were excited to test whether the iPad Pro is able to provide a consistent performance level under a prolonged load or if the SoC has to throttle at some signal. We usually utilise the app GFXBench for this purpose. Unfortunately, it does non appear to be compatible with iPadOS thirteen.4 and a connexion to the servers of the provider could not exist established.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 39.ane °C = 102 F Average: 37 °C = 99 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 37.iv °C = 99 F Average: 35.8 °C = 96 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ability Supply (max.) 31.8 °C = 89 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 37.2 °C = 99 F Average: 33.half dozen °C = 92 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 33.9 °C = 93 F Average: 32 °C = 90 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 31.7 °C = 89 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The boilerplate temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.iv °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.i °C / 102 F, compared to the boilerplate of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats upward to a maximum of 37.iv °C / 99 F, compared to the boilerplate of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the boilerplate temperature for the upper side is 33.six °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
Speakers
As usual, the four speakers of the iPad Pro are powerful and exceptional for a tablet.
The pink noise exam confirms the well-balanced sound stage of the four speakers, although due to the lack of a big resonance bedchamber, lower tones are naturally somewhat underrepresented. The iPad Pro 12.nine (2020) still produces very harmonious stereo sound overall. External speakers tin be connected to the tablet via USB-C or Bluetooth.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can exist checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 audio assay
(±) | speaker loudness is boilerplate but adept (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average half-dozen.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.half dozen% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - merely 4.ane% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.v% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (ix.8% deviation to median)
Compared to same class
» iv% of all tested devices in this grade were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The all-time had a delta of seven%, average was 19%, worst was fifty%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of iii%, average was twenty%, worst was 65%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 audio assay
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on boilerplate 10.two% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is boilerplate (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - but 4.6% abroad from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - merely 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - xvi.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is boilerplate (18.four% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% like, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of five%, average was xx%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were improve, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Free energy Management - Long Battery Life Guaranteed
Free energy Consumption
The current iPad Pro 12.ix draws slightly less power than its predecessor and in spite of the far bigger display, the consumption is like to that of the iPad Pro 11. Windows tablets such as the Microsoft Surface Pro seven are far from this level of free energy efficiency. Meanwhile, Android tablets such equally the Samsung Milky way Tab S6 are even more than economical yet.
Apple includes an 18-watt power adapter with the iPad Pro. In our test, fully charging the battery of the iPad Pro 12.ix (2020) took 2:55 hours.
Battery Life
The bombardment life of the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) is more often than not adept, although it is slightly inferior compared to the predecessor's runtimes. However, about 15 hours of simulated web browsing and a good 12 hours of video playback is a argument. In exercise, one battery accuse should easily last one or 2 days.
Although compared to the iPad Pro 11 (2020), the battery of the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) is significantly larger - 9720 vs 7538 mAh -, the bigger battery does non translate into an advantage for the latter, since its runtimes are about 14% shorter. This stems from the substantially larger, higher resolution and thus more than demanding display.
Bombardment Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 30h 27min | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 15h 05min | |
| Big Cadet Bunny H.264 1080p | 12h 18min | |
| Load (maximum effulgence) | 2h 47min |
Pros
+ bonny design
+ fast and reliable Wi-Fi
+ good 12-MP camera
+ wide range of accessories
+ color-accurate 120Hz display
+ nifty performance
+ stiff quad speakers
+ long bombardment life
Cons
- no IP certification
- case is slightly too flexible
- not-expandable storage
- only 12 months of warranty
- expensive tablet, expensive accessories
Verdict: Expanding its Lead
The iPad Pro is currently the best tablet on the marketplace. Information technology is extremely fast, its well-calibrated True Tone display is a blessing for artistic users, the user experience is tremendously smooth, its four integrated speakers produce fantabulous stereo sound and the tablet is among the all-time in terms of the battery life as well.
Apple has further optimized what has already been the best tablet on the market with a few cautious updates.
All of these features were already present on the previous version. However, a few conservative updates such as an updated camera with a LiDAR sensor, a slightly faster CPU and 6 GB of RAM by default regardless of the storage configuration now further separate the iPad Pro from other Apple tablets, not to mention Android alternatives.
Thanks to its bigger screen, the iPad Pro 12.9 (2020) every bit the current flagship of the iPad Pro series is even better suited to professional person apply cases than the iPad Pro eleven (2020). That being said, its full potential can only exist unlocked via accessories, which similar the tablet itself, are fairly expensive. The Magic Keyboard, which is set to be released at the end of May, should bring it quite shut to a notebook.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2020 - 2020-05-thirteen 05/13/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero
Tablet - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
My fascination for computers started with the C64. Since then, I've put everything that comes my mode in terms of hardware through its paces. From the C64 to the Amiga 500 and the first PC with an 8088 CPU, my listing of projects has grown increasingly longer. For more 20 years at present I have too turned my hobby into my profession and have been active in the mobile department of Notebookcheck since 2021. Before that, I worked every bit a hardware editor for IDG Media (tecChannel.de) and VNU Business Publications (PC professional), amid others.
Fifty-fifty in my youth I was already very enthusiastic about engineering science, and equally a result I started building PCs, optimizing them, and writing programs while I was still in school. When dealing with the inevitable hardware and software problems associated with computers, I was always relentless in my search for the necessary solutions. The compact forms of laptops and smartphones introduced further challenges in this regard. In my reviews for Notebookcheck I try to communicate equally objectively equally possible how well a device copes with these hurdles.
.170
Manuel Masiero, 2020-05-fifteen (Update: 2020-05-19)
Powerbank Für Ipad Pro 12.9 Test,
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-iPad-Pro-12-9-2020-Review-Fine-tuning-the-Flagship.465642.0.html
Posted by: curtisfiry1988.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Powerbank Für Ipad Pro 12.9 Test"
Post a Comment